Utrecht University invites applications for a PhD position on Phase-Out in Science as a Lever for Sustainability Transformations. In this project, you will investigate how science, often perceived as a neutral force, is being challenged to address environmental concerns, technological risks, and societal inequalities. By examining radical transformative initiatives such as moratoria, bans, and boycotts on specific research practices, this project seeks to understand their dynamics, ethical implications, and broader impacts on academic and societal systems.
Your job In an increasingly uncertain world – politically, technologically, and ecologically – the role of science is increasingly debated. Long regarded a neutral bastion of progress, scientific practice was always thought to work best if kept separately from political concerns. However, many scholars now problematise this idea, arguing that science – at least partially – contributes to societies’ failure to address environmental concerns as well as reproducing inequalities and technological risks. The image of a ‘neutral science’ is increasingly debated. Science itself is becoming politicised.
One way in which this politicisation takes place is through the emergence of radical transformative initiatives that advocate restricting or even ending particular research practices via governance proposals such as moratoria, bans, or boycotts. These initiatives focus for instance on the phase out of certain forms of knowledge production, technoscientific solutions, and collaborative arrangements. Examples include cutting financial ties with fossil fuel companies or restricting research deemed to be problematic such as certain forms of climate manipulation. Such calls for the politicisation of scientific practices are highly controversial, as many view them as a threat to academic freedom – and at times, to the principles of the Enlightenment or democracy. Nonetheless, a thorough empirical evaluation of the nature, dynamics and impacts of these initiatives to phase-out scientific practices as well as the multiplicity of values and expectations underlying them is still missing.
Guided by supervisors
Dr Jarno Hoekman and
Dr Jeroen Oomen, this project will develop that empirical evaluation of phase-out in science systems. As a PhD candidate you will be studying both the visions and (expected) impacts of such initiatives, as well as their controversial nature and underlying moral and value-based struggles. As an in-road to studying phase-out the project will particularly focus on radical transformative initiatives that call for moratoria, bans and boycotts on research practices in the interdisciplinary realm of the sustainability sciences. While initiatives in this domain have become more prominent and visible (e.g. relating to geoengineering, the use of animals in research) studies of their dynamics, politics and impacts, as well as the underlying moral and value-based struggles and trade-offs of those involved are limited so far. This is surprising, as these calls for the phase-out of particular forms of scientific practice concern both a struggle over the future of the academic system, and a struggle over what is considered valid and legitimate scientific knowledge production about the future.
As a PhD candidate in this project, you will conduct in-depth empirical studies on the dynamics of phase-out in science systems and research practices. With broad pencil strokes, the following research activities are foreseen for this project, from which choices can be made depending on the interest and background of the PhD candidate:
- to characterise phase-out initiatives in science (e.g. motivations, goals, strategies, organisation and governance arrangements, dynamics and impacts) and advance inventory and (process) understanding of these initiatives;
- to examine the ethical, moral and political value struggles implicated in phase-out initiatives and to use moral deliberation to discuss these in relation to dominant epistemological and non-epistemological values such as openness, responsibility and academic freedom;
- to conduct cross-comparative studies of phase-out initiatives focused on their legitimisation struggles, (anticipated) theories of change and visions about the future;
- to examine phase-out initiatives in relation to broader reforms in scientific fields, higher education institutes and transformations of socio-technical and socio-ecological systems, as well as in relation to struggles about the future of academic systems and what is considered valid and legitimate knowledge about futures;
- to develop and apply methods to study phase-out initiatives as ‘interventions’ and ‘experiments’ in the science system as to trace how they direct knowledge production, collaborative arrangements and discourse in scientific fields and societal debates.
As a PhD candidate you will become embedded in the exciting scientific communities that exist on science, technology and society and sustainability sciences within the Copernicus Institute of Sustainable Development. You can develop yourself through participation in congresses, workshops, trainings for PhD candidates, and a vibrant group of PhD candidates within the institute and Graduate School of Geosciences.